It Is Just That Easy. by Dean Gotcher

It Is Just That Easy.

by
Dean Gotcher

How children respond to authority, i.e., to the father's/Father's authority reveals the world (order) in which you are living. Remove the father's/Father's authority from the mind of the child and you remove the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—'creating' a "new" world order based upon the carnal nature of the child, i.e., upon the child's "feeling" of the 'moment,' i.e., upon the child's desire for ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint, negating the "old" world order (which is based upon the father's/Father's authority), i.e., negating the guilty conscience (which is a product of the father's/Father's authority) in the child for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, so the child can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. The child's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., his or her desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment,' i.e., the affective domain is in fact "Pandora's box" (a box full of evils, which once opened can not be closed) just waiting to be opened in order to 'create' a "new" world—'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority—where children (including those in adult bodies) can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. Through the use of dialogue, i.e., "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom the child's affective domain, i.e., the child's desire for ("lusting" after, i.e., coveting) the canal pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates is being 'liberated,' thereby 'liberating' the child's dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., toward the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth. The child's "feelings," 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., 'liberated' from restraint, make him (or her) like an animal, i.e., like one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, Pavlov's dogs (now referred to as "human resource") readily adaptable to 'change,' i.e., seducible, deceivable, and manipulatable by the "group psychotherapist," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' for the "group psychotherapist's," i.e., the facilitator of 'change's' own pleasure and gain—so the "group psychotherapist," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so the "group psychotherapist," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. This is why 'liberals,' i.e., those 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, having 'created' a "new" world order out of their own imagination, i.e., made up of their desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, have such difficulty with, i.e., are dissatisfied with, i.e., resent, i.e., hate "rule of law," i.e., question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack, i.e., hate the father's/Father's authority, i.e., hate parental/Godly restraint. Being forever paranoid of the father's/Father's authority they label any attribute of the father's/Father's authority as being (or potentially becoming) Fascist, racist, a hate crime, divisive, mental illness, psychological, phobic, etc., in order to protect themselves from having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning.

By "encouraging" (pressuring) children to be "positive" (which is based upon the children's natural desire for the carnal pleasure of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates, which includes their natural desire for approval from their peers, i.e., affirmation), 'liberating' the children's carnal nature from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from the "negative," i.e., from the father's commands, rules, facts, and truth which get in the way of their natural desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates (including approval from "the group," i.e., from their peers, affirming their natural desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates), the father's/Father's authority is negated in their thoughts and actions, negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning (questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking, i.e., striking out against the father/Father and his/His authority and anyone who supports it and him/Him) in the process. When, in a facilitated, "psychotherapy," "group grade" classroom (consensus meeting), where children can "experiment," i.e., determine for themselves "right" from "wrong"—based upon their own carnal nature, i.e., their "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love of pleasure and hate of restraint—children are 'liberated' from restraint, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from accountability, i.e., from having to "do right" and "not wrong" according to the father's/Father's will (standards). When the "positive" is accentuated in a "safe space/place/zone," restraint will be used by authority (including by those who are supportive of it) in order to restore or maintain order, i.e., the "old" world order, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the "negative," resulting in the 'liberated' children, i.e., the "positive," hating authority, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., hating the "negative" striking out against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the "negative" in order to remove it from the classroom, i.e., from the meeting, i.e., from the environment, i.e., from the face of the earth. In this so called 'shift" in paradigms (from the father's/Father's way of thinking and acting to the children's' way of thinking and acting) the "group psychotherapist," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' (now in control, i.e., seducing, deceiving, and manipulating the children as "human resource" for his or her own pleasure and gain) ends up ruling over a "new" world order (void of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., void of parental/Godly restraint, i.e., void of a guilty consciences for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning) which he (or she) has 'created'—so he can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will], and desperately wicked [hating whoever prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks it from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' it desires]: who can know it [we can never see the wickedness, i.e., hate of our heart (from our "self") since it is "good" in our eyes, necessary in order to 'liberate' us from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from the preventer, i.e., from the inhibitor or blocker of that which is "good," i.e., the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which our heart desires]?" Jeremiah 17:9

"Ye are they which justify [affirm] yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

The issue of 'change' is not about the children (they are just a means to the end). It is about the facilitator of 'change' wanting to live in a world 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority—so he can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus meeting the facilitator of 'change' is able to replace the father's/Father's authority (the "negative") with the children's carnal "feelings" of the 'moment' (the "positive"). Thereby he is able to 'create' a "new" world order (based upon his own carnal nature) where he can use those under his influence for his own pleasure and gain, receiving their praise as he "helps" them 'liberate' themselves (himself) from the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth so they (he) can do wrong, disobey, sin impunity, i.e., without "feeling" bad, i.e., feeling guilty, i.e., being accountable for their (his) deceitful and wicked ways. Only by 'liberating' the children from the father's/Father's authority can the facilitator himself be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority—the children ("the people") are simply a means to the end, expendable if and when they get in the way. Replacing the preaching, teaching, and discussing of commands, rules, facts and truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority with the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., the children's carnal "feelings" (desires or "self interests") of the 'moment' is the means to the end. The end being a "new" world order (globalism) void of parental/Godly restraint. It is just that easy.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

'Changing' communication (in the home, in the classroom, in the workplace, in entertainment, in the neighborhood, in government, in the church, etc.,) from the preaching, teaching, and discussing (at authorities discretion) of commands, rules, facts, and truth—to be accepted as is, by faith and obeyed—to the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus 'changes' the mind of the child, washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, negating his having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process. Since we all, by nature, dialogue with our "self"—our desires of the 'moment,' and our dissatisfaction with whoever is getting in their/our way, unless we have learned to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline our "self"—it is easy for us to miss the affect dialogue has upon us and the world in which we live when restraint is taken away, i.e., when we get our way, unrestrained, i.e., when the father's/Father's authority is removed from our thoughts and actions. When one side of our dialogue, i.e., pleasure is 'liberated' from restraint, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority, the other side, i.e., hatred toward anyone who gets in our way, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority is 'liberated'—making us "of and for self and the world" only, not only in our thoughts but in our actions. It is just that easy. It is why dialogue, i.e., how you "feel" and what you "think," i.e., 'reasoning' from your "feelings," i.e., from that which is of and for "human nature" over and therefore against preaching, teaching, and discussing commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., that which is of and for the father's/Father's authority has become the means of communication today—replacing facts with theories, belief with opinions, truth with dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., "self" 'justification,' 'liberating' man from the father's/Father's authority, negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process so that everyone can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity (as long as it is done for the "good" of society, i.e., "self").

Have you been asked recently how you "feel" or what you "think" i.e., your opinion regarding something requiring faith? If you responded with "I feel...." and "I think ....," i.e., with your opinion, you just negated faith., i.e., the father's/Father's authority. Even facts, when you first learned them, required faith, i.e., faith in the person teaching them, resulting in you knowing the facts because someone "told you so." Then when you applied them they worked, i.e., made sense—"When you do this this always happens." You can not say "I know" and "I feel" or "I think" at the same time without destabilizing or negating knowing. Even "I think I know" draws knowing, i.e., facts and truth into doubt, i.e., into question. Despite what some people might "think" (and try to talk you into believing) two plus two is always four and can not be any other number. To put your child under such a person would destroy them, i.e., would 'change' their paradigm, i.e., would 'change' their way of thinking and acting toward authority. It is just that easy. They, wanting you to leave your child under their influence, would of course deny it, wanting you to 'justifying' their praxis, i.e., their actions, i.e., their lie.

It is not that the earthly father is perfect, he may be (or may have been) a down right tyrant, it is that his office—which is given to him by the Heavenly Father (who is perfect), in which to serve Him—is perfect. Both the earthly father's and the Heavenly Father's authority (system) are similar in structure, the only difference being the earthly father is still subject to the child's carnal nature, i.e., still subject to using the office for his own pleasure, the other, being perfect, is not subject to the child's carnal nature. Therefore, according to dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., according to those who hate the father's/Father's authority, if you can get rid of (negate) the earthly father's authority system, who is not perfect, you can get rid of (negate) the Heavenly Father's authority system, who is perfect, in the process. The negation of the office of the father's/Father's authority accomplishes the deed. By 'liberating' man from having to be perfect, i.e., having to be righteous, i.e., having to do things right and not wrong, by 'justifying' his carnal nature, i.e., making "human nature," i.e., man's desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward the father's/Father's authority the "norm," all commands, rules, facts, and truth have to be initiated and sustained through the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus alone (there is no father's/Father's authority in an opinion, in dialogue, and in consensus), negating the preaching, teaching, and discussing of commands, rules, facts, and truth to be accepted as given, by faith, and obeyed—effectively negating the gospel message, making it subject to man's "feelings" and "thoughts," i.e., subject to man's opinion. Instead of man evaluating his thoughts and actions from the Word of God, he can, through his use of dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning,' evaluate himself, the world, and the Word of God from his own carnal nature (aufheben). Interpreting it according to his desire ("lust") for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint, i.e., toward the father's/Father's authority he can do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience, i.e., he can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

The guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is engendered when the child recognizes and honors the father's/Father's authority. When the child respects and honors the father's/Father's authority and obeys him/Him he is thinking and acting in a particular way, called a paradigm. When the child disobeys the father/Father, yet recognizes the father's/Father's authority to correct (chasten) him when (and if) he is caught (trying not to get caught) he is thinking and acting according to a different paradigm. In both paradigms the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning is a part of the child's way of thinking, affecting his actions—the first child (paradigm) having learned to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self," being quick to repent, the second child (paradigm) trying to 'justifying' his "self," "not so much," requiring much patience and effort on the part of the one in authority to teach him to repent when he does wrong and do right instead. But when the child 'justifies' his "self" before other children, receiving their affirmation, i.e., questions, challenges, disregards, defies, attacks the father's/Father's authority he is demonstrating a paradigm, which—no longer recognizing the father's/Father's authority, no longer having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, no longer recognizing the need to repent and turn from his deceitful and wicked thoughts and actions—is antithetical to the former two.

Georg Hegel summed it up with the idea that as long as a person "does not think he knows it better than others"—substituting the word wrong with "badly," which means he and those who think like him never see what they are doing or have done that is wrong, as being wrong, only that thy might be doing it or might have done it "badly"—"that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace and affirmation have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel in Carl Friedrich, The Philosophy of Hegel) This is the paradigm we see increasingly become the way children and "adults" think and act today—incapable of seeing and therefore unable to admit that what they are doing or have done that is wrong, is wrong (the guilty conscience for doing wrong having been replaced with the so called super-ego, where a persons "feelings" of the 'moment' guide his thoughts and actions). Try this in business and see how long you last. It is why we are in debt as a nation with those in leadership following a "guilt free" ideology, i.e., way of thinking and acting which guarantees that they will never be able to see what they are doing wrong or what they have done wrong, as being wrong, only needing to do a better job at what they doing (that is wrong)—the only people who are "wrong" (in their mind) are those who accuse them of being/doing wrong. According to them, these are the "negative" people, who, seeing wrong as wrong, i.e., making them "feel" guilty, need to be silenced, removed, or converted, i.e., see things their way if there is to be "peace and affirmation," i.e., "worldly peace and socialist harmony" in the world, where they can do wrong without "feeling bad" about it, i.e., they can do wrong without being personally held accountable for their actions.

The Patriarchal paradigm, i.e., a traditional way of thinking and acting is based upon children recognizing and honoring of the father's/Father's authority, focusing upon "doing right and not wrong" according to the father's/Father's will, obeying his/His commands and rules, accepting his/His facts and truth as given, by faith—having a guilty conscience, repenting when they do wrong, disobey, sin. The Matriarchal paradigm, i.e., a transitional way of thinking and acting is based upon children, who, while recognizing the father's/Father's authority, want to make their "feelings" of the 'moment' a part of the outcome of "doing right and not wrong." The Heresiarchal paradigm, i.e., a transformational way of thinking and acting is based upon children (referred to "children of disobedience" in the scriptures) being hostile toward the father's/Father's authority using dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., dialogue (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue) to 'justify' their desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority.

By the use of dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., dialogue, i.e., turning "feelings", i.e., the children's desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and their dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint into 'facts' (making objective facts and truth, i.e., the father's/Father's facts and truth theories and opinions, thus making the children's theories and opinions, i.e., their subjective 'facts' and 'truth,' i.e., their "feelings" 'facts' and 'truth'), "children of disobedience," having no guilty conscience for their doing wrong, disobedience, or sinning, are 'created.' In this way of thinking and acting, a culture of children (including those in adult bodies)—disobedient to the father's/Father's authority—end up ruling the world, oppressing "the people," doing so in the name of "the people," i.e., for themselves, i.e., so they can enjoy ("lust" after) the carnal pleasure of the 'moment' which the world stimulates—without restraint, i.e., without having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity. "And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them. And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable." "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:4-5, 12 "... and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall cause them to be put to death." Mark 13:12 "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Georg Hegel focused upon the children—making the child's "feelings" the ground of being, negating the father's/Father's authority in the process. "The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, so he can be himself, i.e., of the world only, as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life. When the child obeys the father/Father he creates himself in the father's/Father's image instead of 'discover' his image in the world, where his desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward restraint and the restrainer makes him at-one-with the children of the world—his carnal nature, which he has in common with all the children of the world, thus becoming the basis of common-ism]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life) In doing so, making the child's desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates the basis of 'reality,' Hegel, sounding more like Karl Marx (who was not born yet) could state: "On account of the absolute and natural oneness of the husband, the wife, and the child [their common desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates], where there is no antithesis [no "top-down," "right-wrong" way of thinking and acting] of person to person or of subject to object, the surplus is not the property of one of them, since their indifference is not a formal or a legal one." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life) With this 'logic' your children, property, business, spouse, and even you are not yours but belong to those who espouse and enforce the above ideology (further explained below).

Karl Marx focused upon negating the father's/Father's authority in society. "Once the earthly family [with the children submitting to the father's authority] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son, Jesus Christ, and those following Him submitting to His Heavenly Father's authority], the former [the earthly father's authority] must be destroyed [Vernunft, annihilated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis # 4)

Sigmund Freud focused upon negating the father's/Father's authority in the child's thoughts and actions. "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [the father no longer exercises his authority over the family]." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization)

Bring up the father's/Father's authority today and you automatically disturb the 'liberals,' resulting in them turning on you in order to 'liberate' themselves and "their" world from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning. By replacing the preaching, teaching, and discussing of facts and truth with the dialoging of opinions to a consensus in the "group grade," facilitated classroom, 'liberals' have used "education" to 'create' a "new" world order, pressuring all to follow after Karl Marx, negating the father's/Father's authority in all they say and do, negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—so they can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education) "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

By bringing the affective domain, i.e., "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., the child's natural desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates and his natural dissatisfaction, i.e., resentment, i.e., hatred toward authority into the classroom, making the children's "feelings" of the 'moment' the focus of attention (why you have to have "positive" and not "negative" environments, i.e., "safe zones" or "safe places" so as not to hurt the students "feelings," i.e., make them "feel bad," i.e., feel guilty for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning), Karl Marx, under the cover of psychology ("group psychotherapy"), was able to enter the classroom without alarming the parents and the citizens, creating the world we now see before us, a world of children (in adult bodies) hating anyone who holds them accountable for their deceitful and wicked thoughts and actions.

It is just that easy.

"Freud, Hegel, ... are, like Marx, compelled to postulate external domination and its assertion by force [the father's/Father's authority] in order to explain repression." "The repression of normal adult sexuality [Freud considered all children as being sexually active, i.e., permissive, i.e., deviant] is required only by cultures which are based on patriarchal domination. The foundation on which the man [the children in adult bodies] of the future will be built is already there, in the repressed unconscious [in the carnal nature of the child]; the foundation has to be recovered ['liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"Authoritarianism," i.e., the child submitting himself to the father's authority, as man submits himself to the Heavenly Father's authority, which engenders nationalism, i.e., the citizens submitting themselves to the "rule of law," i.e., to the law of the land, is, in the mind of 'liberal's,' tantamount to Fascism. By generalizing a specific event or practice, i.e., the father's use of force to correct his children, which is acceptable in (foundational to) a traditional society, then associating it to a another event or practice, i.e., a specific event or practice, i.e., Hitler's use of force over (against) the people (which included negating the father's authority over his children—which all forms of socialism, from local to national to global have to do), which was evil, the right of the father's authority to chasten his children when they do wrong and/or disobey can be turned from good into evil, resulting in government removing the right of the father to chasten his children, replacing it with the "right of the child" to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack it instead. The Marxist Theodor Adorno, who was a Transformational Marxist—Marxists who merged Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud, i.e., the individual and society, creating "group psychotherapy"—wrote: "Authoritarian submission was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality) The idea being: get rid of, i.e., negate the father's authority in the home, i.e., negate the children having to honour and respect their father's authority (obey his commands and rules and accept his facts and truth as given, i.e., by faith) and negation of faith in God, i.e., the Heavenly Father will follow, 'liberating' not only the individual and society but the socialists-globalists themselves as well from having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., from being held accountable for their deceitful and wicked thoughts and actions in the process.

Abraham Maslow wrote: "Marxian theory needs Freudian-type instinct theory to round it out. And of course, vice versa." "Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "To identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc." ". . . I've decided to get into the World Federalists, become pro-UN, & the like." "Only a world government with world-shared values could be trusted or permitted to take such powers. If only for such a reason a world government is necessary. It too would have to evolve. I suppose it would be weak or lousy or even corrupt at first—it certainly doesn't amount to much now & won't until sovereignty is given up little by little by 'nations.'" "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World, at least so far as the guiding goal is concerned. To get to that goal is politics & is in time and space & will take a long time & COST MUCH BLOOD." ". . . A caretaker government could immediately start training for democracy & self-government & give it little by little, as deserved." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

All who hold to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "authoritarianism" in the Total Quality Management, School To Work, dialoguing opinions to a consensus (bipartisan) meeting, including in the "group grade," "group psychotherapy," facilitated ("Karl Marx was more right than wrong") classroom will be treated as Abraham Maslow treated his students—as Karl Marx, those who followed after him in the past, and those who continue to follow after him today treat those who respect and honor the father's/Father's authority. "I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

By creating a "positive" environment, sympathetic to the child's natural desire for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, negating the "negative," i.e., the father's/Father's authority which gets in the way, all participants are pressured, for the sake of group approval, i.e., affirmation to turn on (turn and rend) those recognizing, honoring, protecting, and propagating the father's/Father's authority in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus meeting. It is how 'change,' i.e., the "new" world order is initated and sustained.

It is just that easy.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' themselves, i.e., their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the pleasures of the 'moment' over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12